Tuesday, 23 February 2010 22:31

Rating Agencies, the Ultimate Advisor?

Firstly, a timeline of events of Greece debt crisis since Prime Minister George Papandreou's socialist PASOK party won snap elections last October:

 1. October 2009 - The new government discloses the 2009 budget deficit will be 12.7 percent, more than double the previously announced figure.

 2. November 2009 - It also sees public debt rising to 121 percent of GDP in 2010 from 113.4 percent in 2009. EU forecasts on Greece for 2010 are worse, with the deficit seen at 12.2 percent of GDP and national debt rising to 124.9 percent of GDP, the highest ratio in the EU.

 3. December 2009 -- S&P on December 7 puts the country's A- sovereign rating on negative watch.

 4. On Dec 8, Fitch Ratings, which had cut Greece to A- when the government revealed the higher deficit, cuts Greek debt to BBB+ with a negative outlook.

 5. Standard & Poor's cut Greece's rating by one notch on December 16, to BBB-plus from A-minus

 6. Moody's cuts Greek debt to A2 from A1 on December 22 

Secondly, the following table plots euro against dollar from Oct 2009 to today.

The numbers indicate the timing of the above event.

 

Ok, let’s now discuss a bit.

The first two events are disclosures of the fiscal problems in Greece, and they are supposedly very negative news of the economy. Following Event 1, there was actually a downward trendline which reflected increased concern (blue line). The Event 2 was a negative signal as well, but the euro managed to enter the last month of 2009 with a strong support level (red line) and the battle between bulls and bears didn’t finish yet.

Then those rating agencies started to give out their opinions, albeit as late as they usually did. This time, however, everybody started to sell euro in a panic. A downward trend closely correlated to the downgrading decisions (green line).

With additional fears about other euro members, euro continues to fall in the first months of 2010 (yellow line).

I have to say the subprime crisis makes me dislike those rating agencies. They failed to predict the problems and only made things worse when they downgraded those troubled securities. As a result, another round of panic was brought. This time, during the Greece debt crisis, they just did it again.

However, investors and traders always positioned rating agencies as the ultimate advisor. Although real economic events (event 1 & 2) caused concerns, the majority reacted fully when rating agencies started to talk and the time lag lasted for weeks. Furthermore, when the majority relied on rating agencies, an individual investor could only follow their advice to avoid substantial loss.

As long as you can’t outsmart the rating agencies, all you can do is adhering.

 

By Li Yunong
Research & Education Executive of NTU Investment Interactive Club
  
~disclaimer:The information, statistical data and opinions contained herein are of the author’s own, and have been obtained from sources which he/she believes to be reliable, but it does not represent that they are accurate or complete, and they should not be relied upon as such. All opinions expressed and data provided herein are subject to change without notice. The securities mentioned in this report may not be suitable for all types of investors. ALL investments involve different degrees of risk. You should be aware of your risk tolerance level and financial situations at all times. Read any and all prospectuses carefully before making any investment decisions. As you know, a recommendation, which you are free to accept or reject, is not a guarantee for the successful performance of an investment and we are expressly prohibited from guaranteeing accounts against losses arising from market conditions. NTU-IIC and its members will not be held liable in any manner for any losses arising directly or indirectly from investment decisions undertaken based on the information/statistical data/opinions expressed.
 
Comments (3)
pandora
3 Monday, 21 June 2010 15:43
tiffany
Nevertheless,ed hardy jeans ratings from buy cheap pandora rating agencies are still the "best" assessment we can get to judge the credit worthiness of the issuer.links of london bangles true religion jeans
dudr@gmail.com
2 Saturday, 01 May 2010 17:20
MARY

This new technology products to bring real benefits to our lives in many ways a very poor state by the

oto kiralama kiralık oto kiralık araç araba kiralama kiralık araba

Use your judgement
1 Thursday, 25 February 2010 21:41
Eric Seah
Well, I think it all comes down to your own judgement. People use the ratings from rating agencies to assess the credit worthiness of the issuer just like how people use financial statements to assess the financial health of a company. Just like financial statements, ratings from the rating agencies can be flawed and misrepresented. Thus, perhaps investors ultimately still have to rely on own judgement in their investment decisions. Nevertheless, ratings from rating agencies are still the "best" assessment we can get to judge the credit worthiness of the issuer.

Add your comment

Your name:
Your email:
Subject:
Comment (you may use HTML tags here):
  The word for verification. Lowercase letters only with no spaces.
Word verification:

Quote of the week

My approach works not by making valid predictions but by allowing me to correct false ones
- George Soros

Laughters

What a real Bank is?
A place that will lend you money if you can prove that you don't need it. (Bob Hope)

Visitors Number

Content View Hits : 12102